Skip to Content
Flagship offering · End-to-end management of the contract lifecycle

The contract does not end when it is signed

We assume the governance of the entire contract portfolio of the entity or of the group. We do not deliver an isolated opinion: we install a control system with owners, cadence, evidence and metrics, and we answer for its operation.

The starting point

That is where the obligation begins, and with it the risk nobody is measuring.

Every transaction a company enters into begins with an agreement. Almost none is administered as one. It is signed, filed, and nobody reads it again until it becomes a problem: an automatic renewal already in effect, an accrued contractual penalty, a supplier published on the listing of taxpayers with presumptively non-existent transactions, a transaction without demonstrable materiality, a termination without a file.

Breach rarely originates in the legal department: it arises in procurement that did not require the instrument, in treasury that paid without support, in human resources that hired without a file. The metric is therefore allocated by responsible area and consolidated into a single index for the board.

The three silent risks

What happens when the portfolio is not governed.

Operating without cover.

Expired instruments still being performed, annexes that were never signed, services rendered outside the contracted scope. The invoice exists; the legal title does not.

Lack of substance.

Deductions supported only by a tax receipt and a generic contract, with no deliverable, no documented business purpose and no traceability of the consideration.

One-off screening.

The counterparty was checked on the day of onboarding and never again. Restricted-party lists, tax authority listings and judicial records are updated every month; the file is not.

Architecture

Eight modules, a single control system.

Each module operates independently and can be contracted separately; their value multiplies when they work as a single chain of command over the same repository of instruments. Move around the dial to see each one.

Measurement

A board does not read contracts. It reads one number.

Contract failure is rarely legal at origin. It begins in a purchase made without a document, a delivery outside the agreed window, a payment released without support, a hire without a file. So the metric is distributed by responsible area and consolidated into a single index for the board.

ICCGoverning index

Consolidated Contract Compliance Index

It weights every enforceable obligation of the period by the economic value and the criticality of the instrument that contains it, so that a breach in an essential contract counts for more than ten minor deviations elsewhere.

ICC = Σ (obligations met on time × weight) ÷ Σ (enforceable obligations of the period × weight)
Target 95% or aboveAlert 90 to 94.9%Critical below 90%Monthly · Legal
IndicatorFormulaFrequency
Contract coverage
Spend executed under a live instrument ÷ total spend for the period
Monthly
Contracting cycle
Σ business days between request and signature ÷ instruments signed
Monthly
Contractual value leakage
(Amount invoiced − amount due under contract) ÷ amount contracted
Monthly
Materiality index
Transactions with a complete materiality file ÷ deductible transactions of the period
Monthly
Counterparty exposure
Value of instruments with a listed counterparty ÷ total portfolio value
Monthly
Renewal lead time
Renewals decided before T−90 ÷ renewals of the period
Monthly
Contingency coverage
Reserve constituted ÷ contingency estimated under legal opinion
Quarterly

Targets are calibrated in Phase 1 against the entity's own baseline. The figures shown are the AMERICA LEGAL® house standard for comparable portfolios.

Accountability

One contract involves twelve areas. Each answers for its own, measured.

The board receives a consolidated index. Each area receives the part it actually controls, with an explicit target and a named owner. That is what turns a legal service into a management matter.

01

Legal and Contract Management

  • Contracting cycle, request to signature12 business days or less
  • Operating without a live instrumentZero cases
02

Procurement and Supply

  • Spend executed under a live contract90% or above
  • Suppliers with current screening in the cycle100%
03

Finance and Treasury

  • Payments with contractual support and reconciled invoice100%
  • Service-level penalties and credits recovered80% of what is claimable
04

Accounting

  • Transactions with a complete materiality file98% or above
  • Items without documentary supportNone beyond 60 days
05

Tax

  • Transactions with a documented business purpose100%
  • Exposure to counterparties listed under article 69-BZero
06

Commercial and Sales

  • Sales with an instrument signed before first delivery100%
  • Client signature turnaround10 days or less
07

Operations and Projects

  • Contractual milestones met on time95% or above
  • Work performed outside the contracted scopeZero
08

Human Resources

  • Headcount with a current signed individual contract100%
  • Confidentiality and intellectual property undertakings signed100%
09

Information Technology and Security

  • Instruments with a preservation record and time stamp100%
  • Availability of the document vault99.5% or above
10

Compliance and Anti-Money Laundering

  • Counterparties with list screening up to date100%
  • Controlling beneficiary identified and documented100%
11

Internal Audit

  • Instruments sampled each quarter10% of the portfolio
  • Findings remediated within term90% or above
12

General Management and the Board

  • Consolidated Contract Compliance Index95% or above
  • Estimated contingency against constituted reserveCoverage of 1.0x or above

Each area reports on the frequency set for it, against a baseline measured in the first weeks of work. No target is adopted before that baseline exists.

Implementation

From the filing cabinet to the dashboard in one quarter.

Not a promise of eventual improvement. A dated route, with a deliverable at the close of every phase, so that the first quarter already produces a decision instead of a diagnosis.

PhasePeriodActivityDeliverable
F0 · Discovery
Weeks 1 to 2
Survey of the contract universe, entities, user areas and systems, with document ingestion.
Preliminary inventory and gap diagnosis
F1 · Normalisation
Weeks 3 to 5
Clause abstraction, construction of the contract map, critical-date calendar and indicator baseline.
Contract map, initial traffic light and calibrated targets
F2 · Configuration
Weeks 4 to 7
Workspace set-up, templates, authorisation flows, document vault, electronic signature and access profiles.
Operating platform and rules of use
F3 · Assisted operation
Weeks 8 to 12
First full counterparty verification cycle, opinion on priority files and training by area.
Live dashboard and executive report on the first cycle
F4 · Steady state
Monthly
Counterparty monitoring, renewal management, indicators, regulatory watch and contingency containment.
Monthly report, quarterly committee and board decision agenda

The periods overlap by design: configuration begins before normalisation closes, to shorten the time to first result.

What is delivered, and how often, once in steady state

Monthly

Contract governance report

Indicators by area, portfolio traffic light, counterparty verification results and critical dates falling in the period.

Monthly or bi-monthly

Counterparty verification

Restricted lists, tax authority listings and legal background, with an alert sheet for each finding.

Quarterly

Compliance committee

Session with General Management: findings, contingencies, remediation and renewal decisions.

Annual

Substance audit

Compliance and economic substance report, integrating the transfer pricing study.

The instrument

You do not have to take our word for how a portfolio is governed. Look at it.

Contract governance is not run on spreadsheets. It runs on our own dashboard. This is its entry screen, loaded with a demonstration portfolio of eight instruments.

Next step

Do you have a matter to review?

Describe your situation in three lines. We will tell you frankly whether it is a matter we can take on.

AMERICA LEGAL®
Distinctions and recognitions
Distintivo ESR, Empresa Socialmente ResponsableLos Mejores Abogados de Mexico 2024Latin American Quality Institute, Marca de Confianza 2025Latin American Quality Institute, QESG CertificationLatin American Quality Institute, The Law Awards 2023Legal In TechLegal In Tech, Sostenibilidad

International Firm of the Year 2022 — Tops México ranking, Los Mejores Abogados de México

Fundación Teletón — recognition on national television for pro bono counsel, 2025